If I'm right from last tweet (https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/399949642286116864 …) bolded statement from @virginiasbe not exactly correct http://electionlawblog.org/?p=56641 Right?
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
.
@rickhasen It's completely correct, just not quite the whole story. But not misleading.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @DCCyclone
@DCCyclone how so? In some circumstances voter MUST show up to have provisional vote count, no?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
.
@rickhasen "Must" as a practical matter in some cases, but not as a legal matter. That's why voter appearance encouraged.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @DCCyclone
.
@DCCyclone This makes no sense to me: not as a legal matter? If voter wants ballot to count sometimes presence will be legally necessary3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen@DCCyclone not sure why you think this, rick - example?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@erinmonaghan @DCCyclone if board cannot verify address or other data, voter might provide verification
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.