If I'm right from last tweet (https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/399949642286116864 …) bolded statement from @virginiasbe not exactly correct http://electionlawblog.org/?p=56641 Right?
.@DCCyclone This makes no sense to me: not as a legal matter? If voter wants ballot to count sometimes presence will be legally necessary
-
-
@rickhasen@DCCyclone not sure why you think this, rick - example? -
@erinmonaghan@DCCyclone if board cannot verify address or other data, voter might provide verification
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen@DCCyclone Not sure where you are getting this? Anything voters want to say could be sent in writing. What Hypo are you thinking? -
.
@thebestWebb@DCCyclone I see now. So physical presence not required but voter effort is required---cannot rely on legal representative -
@rickhasen@DCCyclone Right. And in the few cases where non AB/ID provs are counted usually staff work will be sufficient (1/2) -
@rickhasen@DCCyclone Since there is little wiggle room in eligibility, what's left are errors that registrars can chase down. (2/2)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@rickhasen Maybe splitting hairs, but sometimes, yes, Board needs info that only the voter would have. But often unneeded.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.