.@rickhasen It's completely correct, just not quite the whole story. But not misleading.
If I'm right from last tweet (https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/399949642286116864 …) bolded statement from @virginiasbe not exactly correct http://electionlawblog.org/?p=56641 Right?
-
-
-
@DCCyclone how so? In some circumstances voter MUST show up to have provisional vote count, no? -
.
@rickhasen "Must" as a practical matter in some cases, but not as a legal matter. That's why voter appearance encouraged. -
.
@DCCyclone This makes no sense to me: not as a legal matter? If voter wants ballot to count sometimes presence will be legally necessary -
@rickhasen@DCCyclone not sure why you think this, rick - example? -
@erinmonaghan@DCCyclone if board cannot verify address or other data, voter might provide verification
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.