Really strange Judge Posner walk-back of his remarks on voter ID: http://goo.gl/fb/1DWYS cc: @jswatz @ChuckLane1 @MikeSacksHP
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen@jswatz@ChuckLane1@MikeSacksHP Posner speaking ex cathedral is incapable of error as such. Or of shutting up.1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
He did not explicitly recant Crawford in his book nor deny in TNR what he said on Mike's show. I think.
@Profepps@rickhasen@MikeSacksHP2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @espinsegall
.
@espinsegall@Profepps@MikeSacksHP When asked if he was wrong by Mike, he said "Yes, absolutely."1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Profepps
Guys, in TNR he's talking about his book not Mike's show.
@Profepps:@rickhasen@espinsegall@MikeSacksHP I heard it!”1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @espinsegall
.
@espinsegall@Profepps@MikeSacksHP That makes no sense. He's saying I was not wrong. On HuffPo he said "yes, absolutely" wrong.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen@espinsegall@MikeSacksHP So he either wasn't wrong, or may have been wrong, or was wrong. But OTHERS can't say he WAS wrong.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Profepps
.
@Profepps@espinsegall@MikeSacksHP I go back to my characterization of this as a really strange walk-back.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
The TNR piece might have been written before the show. But even if it wasn't, the piece is about the book.
@rickhasen@Profepps@MikeSacksHP2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
.@espinsegall @Profepps No way. The show sparked the tempest. No one noticed the sentence befoe @MikeSacksHP.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.