.@kenvogel and more importantly money through Chamber and other c6 and potentially c4 organizations
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen not sure that's more impactfull when it comes to their narrow interests1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen yup, but - again - that's hard $ in the system. Not big outside spending.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen Not what I'm saying. Lobbying & hard $/bundling is MORE effective way for corps. to influence policy than big outside spending.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen but, again, big corps investing more in -- & getting more from -- lobbying & hard $/bundling.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen Lockheed (biggest federal contractor) & its execs, 2012: $15M on lobbying, $3M in hard $ donations, < $300k to super PACs/527s1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen unreported lobbying by execs also unknowable. Pt is: smart corps spend--& get--more w/in the system, as empirical evidence shows.0 replies 1 retweet 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.