@rickhasen @sbagen @ProfGuyCharles that's what I am wondering. If jurisdictions are bailed in to sec 5 under 3c, ct could invalidate sec 5
.@sbagen @ProfTolson @ProfGuyCharles My question is if Ct. had struck section 5, would it have killed bail-in too?
-
-
-
@rickhasen@sbagen@ProfGuyCharles unless sec 3c is its own regime and the requirement of intentional discrim is enough to distinguish it
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen@sbagen@ProfTolson@ProfGuyCharles Isn't the Sec.5-like provisions of bail-in found in Sec.3? Curious how they work in practice -
@ElectProject@rickhasen@sbagen@ProfGuyCharles in the statute, sec 5 references only section 4, not section 3c, as a trigger
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.