@rickhasen If the concern is one of unfair wealth effects, then offer scotus seats by lottery.
-
-
-
.
@tedfrank Let's at least use the lottery proceeds to pay for the sequester-induced cuts to the federal courts. -
@rickhasen@adamliptak By "lottery" I mean random lot. Tho tickets could still be resold on Stubhub.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen I'd defend it. First come first served isn't free, it just costs time instead of $. Paying for line sitter Pareto improvement. -
We have a winner:
@tedfrank defends paying people to stand in line for SCOTUS argument spots. -
@rickhasen@tedfrank TV can fix this but that is such a new technology -
@gronke@rickhasen Jon Stewart's unfair coverage of the VRA arguments set back TV advocates a generation.@adamliptak - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen The real question is whether there is anything wrong with it. -
@MUDDLAW@rickhasen But I am not a law professor. -
@MUDDLAW@rickhasen But certainly you could be one. And a good one btw... -
@JoeRodriguezPR@rickhasen TY Joe, but statehooders are bared from law school faculties. -
@MUDDLAW@rickhasen I know. Pregúntale a los Cuprill en Ponce... -
@JoeRodriguezPR@rickhasen Ponce es un mundo en si mismo -
@MUDDLAW@rickhasen Al final HC tuvo q retirarse... aquel es el reino de POA...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen I am not taking the bait.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.