From UC-Irvine election-law prof. MT @rickhasen: I've read transcript and got no hope for Justice Kennedy to sustain Voting Rights Act.
.@DLeonhardt @byelin I address that point directly in my new post: http://electionlaw2.blogspot.com/2013/02/no-hope-reading-tea-leaves-in-voting.html …
-
-
@rickhasen@byelin It's the "no hope," implying 0%, that seems fair to question. -
.
@DLeonhardt@byelin right. As I acknowledge at the end the Justices can do what they want. But it is virtually no hope then. -
@rickhasen@byelin "Virtually" -- an odds-friendly word!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.