@rickhasen (And I realize we disagree on whether the conduct at issue - corporate contributions - is or should be protected by the 1st A.)
-
-
-
@ashbylaw@rickhasen circumvention (that at issue here) IS prohibited. Prophylaxis upon prophylaxis. -
@DBCapStrategies Was not a suggestion of legislation, but rather a statement of principle.
-
@ashbylaw@rickhasen danielczyk has separate tie to circumvention element, corporate contribution was vehicle, also at issue in McCutcheon. -
@DBCapStrategies I know, as I rep'd one of the Defs in the trial court, where we successfully argued (twice) against the corp. contrib. ban.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen Instead of total ban on conduct otherwise protected by 1st A. b/c of potential circumvention, govt should just ban circumvention.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.