My take, w/ labor beat colleague @greenhousenyt , on the jaw-dropping recess appointment appeals court ruling today http://goo.gl/YvZLs
-
-
Replying to @charlie_savage
.
@charlie_savage Was Justice Brennan's recess appointment to the Supreme Court illegal under today's decision?3 replies 6 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen I think yes. Ike recess appointed him in October 1956, right, so that was intra-session.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @charlie_savage
.
@charlie_savage I guess Baker v. Carr is toast.2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen Ha, but Brennan long since properly confirmed by '62. What about Gregory. Pryor, and Pickering CoA panel/en-banc decisions tho?1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
Replying to @charlie_savage
.@charlie_savage Maybe it is 'fruit of the poisonous tree." Whoops, maybe we cant rely on that either
8:13 PM - 25 Jan 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.