6 of 9 states fully covered by Section 5 of Voting Rights Act passed new voting restrictions since 2010 http://tnat.in/ftnvE
.@AriBerman My point is that for CJ Roberts, question is if covered states are appreciably different from others for VRA constitutionality
-
-
.
@rickhasen no region more consistently passed new voting restrictions than the South. solution should be to expand section 5, not gut it -
@ariberman@RickHasen Can SCOTUS expand VRA though? My understanding is only Congress can do that -
.
@bmockaveli@AriBerman The Supreme Court cannot expand the scope of section 5 to cover more jurisdictions.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.