I shouldn't be surprised that Christian Adams (@electionlawctr) didn't publish my comment replying to his false claims http://electionlawblog.org/?p=38895
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen Still obsessing about someone sending you email that sounds like something I wrote? People actually read and repeat my writings.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElectionLawCtr
.
@ElectionLawCtr But that doesn't excuse your failure to link to my response.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen I rarely read your blog. I especially don't link to blogs that toss around reckless claims people are lying.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElectionLawCtr
.
@ElectionLawCtr I tried to post a comment to YOUR site yesterday.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen Just saw for the first time. Just approved. So there. Are you going to debate@HvonSpakovsky or#JohnFund Yes or No?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElectionLawCtr
@ElectionLawCtr I already answered your question and it doesn't detract from you making a false statement on your blog. I never refused.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen Did you check with your publisher whether they received an offer - yes or no?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElectionLawCtr
@ElectionLawCtr Still can't admit that you had a false statement on your blog that I refused to debate? I'm done here.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen Maybe I believe the person who told me more than you. Ever consider that?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
John Fund wrote to me yesterday that he has no idea where the refusal to debate allegation came from. And now we're done. @ElectionLawCtr
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.