A three-judge district court found that North Carolina's congressional districts were an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. These kinds of cases come up to #SCOTUS on "appeal" not a "cert. petition" and a ruling not to hear an appeal means the lower court got it right. /2
-
-
Show this thread
-
So it's almost impossible to believe that Court won't hear the North Carolina case. Last term the Court ducked the merits in the Wisconsin partisan gerrymandering case. But it is clear that the conservatives on the Court are skeptical federal courts can police gerrymandering. /3
Show this thread -
The wildcard last year was Justice Kennedy, who had vacillated on the question whether courts could hear partisan gerrymandering cases since 2004. The Court's punt in Wisconsin was because Kennedy wasn't ready to join the four liberals to start federal courts policing this. /4
Show this thread -
And now Kennedy is gone, replaced by Kavanaugh. We don't know what Justice Kavanaugh thinks specifically about partisan gerrymandering, but his general ideological orientation makes me very skeptical he'd vote to have courts enter this "political thicket." /5
Show this thread -
It's not impossible that Kavanaugh or even CJ Roberts is willing to police partisan gerrymandering, but I wouldn't bet on it. They might look for another way to sidestep the issue in NC, and in a Maryland case also pending. /6
Show this thread -
But they won't be able to duck partisan gerrymandering forever. And if they don't police there will be more egregious gerrymanders in states with unified control of legislature and governship where they draw district lines. /7
Show this thread -
I do like the argument of
@ProfGuyCharles and Luis Fuentes-Rohwer that if the Court really wants to stay out of the thicket overall, it is better to police the most egregious cases. https://harvardlawreview.org/2018/11/judicial-intervention-as-judicial-restraint/ … That's the best pitch to Roberts /8Show this thread -
But I'm bearish & suggested that if the Court decides that federal courts cannot hear partisan gerrymandering cases, it's next target could be to declare unconstitutional the use of nonpartisan redistricting commissions to draw congressional districts. https://blog.harvardlawreview.org/the-next-threat-to-redistricting-reform/ … /9
Show this thread
New conversation -
-
-
I think CJ Roberts feels the burn from Shelby and will be ready for some new oversight.
-
I think Roberts is quite pleased with how the post Shelby voting environment is shaping up. I don’t think he perceives any “burn” to feel.
-
Yeah, I see no reason to believe Roberts did not get exactly what he wanted out of Shelby County.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Bonjour you can read it here: Thread by
@rickhasen: "There's an excellent chance that tomorrow the Supreme Court will announce it will take up (again) the question whether p […]"#SCOTUS https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1081014887705280513.html … Have a good day.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Or, the Court could delay the case to the next term, and then decide that because it was too close to the 2020 election and there would be a new map for 2022 it was moot.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ugh. So depressing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The court will determine that it can't rule on it because doing so helps Republicans. There is no additional analysis needed.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This thread is deeply depressing. One ray of hope: State Constitutions. Whatever SCOTUS says may be persuasive as to what similar State provisions mean, but its not conclusive. Rulings by State SC limited to the meaning of State Constitutions are not reviewable by SCOTUS.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yet if Dems win big in 2020 and control a lot more redistricting then, of course, the SCOTUS will suddenly "discover" how malicious gerrymandering is.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.