For those questioning whether Ed Whelan may not be acting in good faith in his current role, here's my own unrelated interaction with him. The “Whelan Way:” Ed Whelan’s Bad Faith and Nasty Attack on My Book on Justice Scalia’s Legacy" https://electionlawblog.org/?p=98592
-
-
Indeed, assuming Dr. Ford and the committee agree on the ground rules for her to testify next week, I'd think it more likely that Kavanaugh withdraws than McConnell puts his R Senators through a public committee hearing with Dr. Ford.
Show this thread -
It is kind of amazing that Whelan apparently couldn't even get a place like the Daily Caller or Breitbart to run his "story" about mistaken identity.
Show this thread -
So despite my initial view that such a boneheaded thing couldn't be centrally planned, it appears that it was....centrally planned by Senate Rs and the White House.https://twitter.com/JesseCharlesLee/status/1042965916248694791 …
Show this thread -
Ed Whelan’s trial balloon burst this morning (for which he still faces a serious potential tort case for defamation) and his (faux?) contrition is very satisfying for those of us who have long argued that Ed does not operate in good faith.https://twitter.com/EdWhelanEPPC/status/1043117304152817664 …
Show this thread -
I hope people remember this when considering including Ed in symposia and events where people with diverse views come together for reasoned discussion. Appropriate that the first response to his pseudo-apology is from Louise Menschpic.twitter.com/X0CgnhRHJv
Show this thread -
And let’s not miss for a second that Ed is *only* apologizing for *naming* the classmate, and not for raising a false claim based on no credible evidence in order to undermine the testimony of Dr. Ford for purely political reasons.
Show this thread -
He did not even give the poor guy a chance to deny the false charges. A breach of basic journalistic ethics (ed writes for
@NRO)Show this thread -
And for those journalists writing about Ed’s “apology,” you should note he did not apologize for falsely accusing another man of attempted rape, only for naming him. Still accomplishing his purpose to try to buck up nomination with unsupported mistaken identity theory
Show this thread - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Rick, it also makes it impossible now for Grassley to avoid subpoenaing Judge to testify.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If anything, the recklessness of Whelan's accusation points out that, in desperation, no one is safe from rampaging Republicans out to save a deeply troubled nomination. No one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.