Real question here is if Ed is the lone ranger here or this is was vetted with his Federalist Society/Trump Administration/Judicial Confirmation Network allies. I'd bet on lone ranger because this is both loony AND counterproductive (makes case for FBI investigation compelling)
-
-
Show this thread
-
I just cannot see the rational calculation that accusing another man of attempted rape who travelled in the same social circles could actually help bring any wavering Republicans to vote for Kavanaugh.
Show this thread -
And yet, lots of folks pointing out to me that Leonard Leo may be involved in spreading these ideas, and there was the Kavanaugh doppelganger Parker column (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/is-there-a-kavanaugh-doppelganger/2018/09/18/88418f52-bb86-11e8-a8aa-860695e7f3fc_story.html?utm_term=.f0b695b574aa …). So maybe they are irrational enough to try this boneheaded move supporting reason for FBI invest.
Show this thread -
Seems like they've settled on a defense strategy of raising identity for purposes of reasonable doubt, as opposed to attacking Dr. Ford as lying about whether the incident happened. They may have calculated that all they need is reasonable doubt to get Kav over the hump.
Show this thread -
I think that's a miscalculation to believe that raising doubt as to identity will be enough to insulate Senate Republicans from the wrath of women and men voters who will see this strategy for what it is.
Show this thread -
Indeed, assuming Dr. Ford and the committee agree on the ground rules for her to testify next week, I'd think it more likely that Kavanaugh withdraws than McConnell puts his R Senators through a public committee hearing with Dr. Ford.
Show this thread -
It is kind of amazing that Whelan apparently couldn't even get a place like the Daily Caller or Breitbart to run his "story" about mistaken identity.
Show this thread -
So despite my initial view that such a boneheaded thing couldn't be centrally planned, it appears that it was....centrally planned by Senate Rs and the White House.https://twitter.com/JesseCharlesLee/status/1042965916248694791 …
Show this thread -
Ed Whelan’s trial balloon burst this morning (for which he still faces a serious potential tort case for defamation) and his (faux?) contrition is very satisfying for those of us who have long argued that Ed does not operate in good faith.https://twitter.com/EdWhelanEPPC/status/1043117304152817664 …
Show this thread -
I hope people remember this when considering including Ed in symposia and events where people with diverse views come together for reasoned discussion. Appropriate that the first response to his pseudo-apology is from Louise Menschpic.twitter.com/X0CgnhRHJv
Show this thread -
And let’s not miss for a second that Ed is *only* apologizing for *naming* the classmate, and not for raising a false claim based on no credible evidence in order to undermine the testimony of Dr. Ford for purely political reasons.
Show this thread -
He did not even give the poor guy a chance to deny the false charges. A breach of basic journalistic ethics (ed writes for
@NRO)Show this thread -
And for those journalists writing about Ed’s “apology,” you should note he did not apologize for falsely accusing another man of attempted rape, only for naming him. Still accomplishing his purpose to try to buck up nomination with unsupported mistaken identity theory
Show this thread - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I only became aware of him after seeing his bad faith exchanges with you on Twitter after you dared to write a critical analysis of his idol and the patron saint of conservative legal thought (reading your book now btw and love it).
-
Were you at the lecture last year? It was excellent.
-
Yes it was great. I finally had time on break here waiting for bar results to pickup a copy and read it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.