Adam Liptak discussing my new paper on “the doctrine of one last chance.” /1https://twitter.com/adamliptak/status/1041704991009001472 …
-
-
It's debatable. In CU, the Chief took the position that McConnell hadn't involved a properly presented request to overrule Austin. Note that an even more forceful example is Wayfair itself, since Quill had reaffirmed precedent. (The Chief was in dissent in Wayfair, after all.)
-
Doubling down on precedent can also just mean that a subset of justices really want to overrule and will try to do so whenever they can. Court doubled down on Booth and then overruled it as soon as possible.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.