Didn’t someone report that Kavanaugh’s good friend works at that firm? I’ll look for a link.
-
New conversation
-
-
-
One theory is that those Qns could have caused him to purger himself later a basis for an impeachment hearing after Dems have taken back the presidency or house/sen, and that it was better to have him in record lying now because R-controlled committee will approve no matter what.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm not saying she's Joe McCarthy, but her questions to Kavanaugh about Kasowitz Benson Torres (which started as "Have you ever discussed", then changed to "Were you ever part of a conversation") sure seemed McCarthy-esque.https://twitter.com/KDbyProxy/status/1037849979820359683 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She over promised. It was disappointing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I went back and watched that, and I think part of the reason she jumped on it the way she did was because he was so shifty in answering the question. I think Dems knew of the friendship and wanted to ask the question, but it was Ks shiftiness that made her go full prosecutor.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
FYI they are covering up documents... 90% to be exact..they know this dud has issues.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
https://www.kasowitz.com/people/edward-e-mcnally/ … I felt it clearly indicated Brett Kavanaugh had conversations with Edward McNally concerning the Russia investigation. If you are aware that Marc E. Kasowitz’s clients at Kasowitz Benson Torres include Oleg Deripaska, where Ed McNally is a partner.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Republicans withheld information from the Judiciary Committee. Then, this issue broke on Thursday evening & R's had over 60 women lined up to rebut. It's reasonable to believe they knew about this and, possible other issues being hidden from view.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I suspect that Kamari or someone on her team was informed by a single source.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
*If* there is bombshell evidence it makes sense to hold it as long as possible. The later it gets the harder for the Senate to get someone else through before the chamber possibly flips. Running the clock would be savvy. *If* there is evidence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No it’s not. I expect these things now.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He has a close friend that works for the firm. The line of questioning was completely valid. And his replies were untruthful at best.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not for cable news, it doesn't seem odd ONE bit
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Been disappointed in her thru this process. This & the selective editing. Had hoped for a higher standard from her
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also seems odd to struggle to annunciate the name of a firm in which your best friend is a partner
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sen. Harris isn't very bright.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Odd sort of nothing that makes a person pretend they don't even know how to pronounce a name they're obviously very familiar with.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She got 4 Pinocchio's
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
*perjure