What is it about these new 5th Circuit judges? First Judge Ho did this and now Judge Willett.https://twitter.com/OrinKerr/status/1035682146164207616 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Can’t read more than that terrible introduction, but reminds me what triggered me about the last newsworthy Willett ophttps://twitter.com/mikesacksesq/status/1019057871093452800?s=21 …
Yeah, exactly. I am a longtime Willett critic, but don't get the furor over this at all. But it is terrible writing.
That is a pileup of bad legal prose and mixed metaphors, however: Kevlar, Sisyphus, kudzu, oh my.
Yes. The two opinions are very different.
Maybe South Park can reboot this and make it about Posner.http://youtu.be/bOR38552MJA
Judges cannot simply to add a point of view or a personal statement that does not further either the decisional or educational value of the majority opinion. They’re not for a judge to rehash the facts and/or legal principles which the majority based its decision.
I agree with you that Judge Willett’s is proper for a concurring opinion as it is most certainly educational and serves the purpose of indicating to parties in future cases how far the court is willing to go down this particular road.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.