1) If it was motivated to help the campaign and not reported, it was an illegal campaign expenditure. If coordinated with campaign, an illegal unreported excessive in-kind contribution 2) If motivated to help campaign, unreported campaign expenditure 3) Litigation settlementhttps://twitter.com/KDbyProxy/status/1032376611184685056 …
-
-
Why would it be ok to call it a litigation settlement if there was no pending litigation? Daniels and McDougal weren’t threatening to sue, were they? Or have I blocked out some of this already?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.