I'm skeptical of op-eds written by lawyers who have business before the Supreme Court offering advice about what liberals (or any group for that matter) should or should not do about a pending judicial nomination.
-
-
I think that’s a fair criticism worth considering, but a murkier line than having client-related business.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They might. SO we should ignore the profs at Yale and Harvard, and just listen to those at . . . hmmmm . . . places like
@CWRU_Law and Chicago-Kent and maybe UCIrvine. How's that? -
seems eminently reasonable to me
-
I endorse this position, provided the privilege follows me post-VAP.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't fully agree with Amar's Op-Ed, but the idea that it was written to get his students clerkships on the Court seems to me implausible and not attentive to or respectful of his long career of academic iconoclasm.
-
I think that's right.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.