Why is Thomas consistently relegated to the parentheticals and footnotes of originalists? Scalia called himself a fainthearted originalist. Thomas never did. And his writings demonstrate why. Thomas is and never was a sidekick.https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/1022264502018957312 …
-
-
True, and I’m glad you were able to plug your book. But by suggesting “the record we have” on originalism is limited to “Scalia (and Thomas),” you’re ensuring your conclusion about conservative results by limiting your review not just to conservatives but to one in particular.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.