I draw a distinction in the article between laws that seek to regulate lies in campaigns (likely a 1st Amendment violation) and lies about the where/how/when of voting (much more likely to survive First Amendment challenge)https://twitter.com/michaelmorley11/status/1022528140265103360 …
-
-
It's been awhile since I've read your piece; I remember thinking it was insightful and look forward to revisiting it. I think the Roberts Court may have gone even further in the pro-free-speech direction in the intervening years, but that may not affect your analysis.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn't the issue whether misleading speech pertaining to voting rights is subject to regulation, but plain old politicians lying about policies is okay?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.