That holding would mean that any voter initiated rules purporting to regulate congressional elections in the name of fostering democracy could be unconstitutional. /9
-
-
And I've demonstrated what it means for President Trump to appoint another Scalia to the Court on the question of voting rights in great detail in this book on Scalia's legacy https://www.amazon.com/Justice-Contradictions-Antonin-Politics-Disruption/dp/0300228643/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1516904231&sr=8-1&keywords=richard+l.+hasen … /20
Show this thread -
Things may get worse before they get better. Who knows if Thomas will go, and if Ginsburg and Breyer can hold on until there's a new Presidential election. Republicans losing their majority in the Senate might stop appointment of most extreme
#SCOTUS candidates after midterms /21Show this thread -
But as I wrote here
@Slate, this is a moment for political action, not complacency, even if the battle against a new Trump#SCOTUS nominee will almost certainly be lost /22https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/06/trump-will-replace-kennedy-with-a-scalia-clone-only-one-thing-might-stop-him.html …Show this thread -
Political organizing now can help down the line later, as there will be many battles to preserve voting and democracy ahead. It won't be easy, but our country and the promise of what it can be (someday and again), demands that we try. /end
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.