Breaking: Supreme Court affirms without opinion lower court order rejecting partisan gerrrymandering claim in North Carolina https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/062818zr_k425.pdf … But two other cases remain pending and will work their way back to Court next term. This is somewhat of a surprise /1
-
-
And when the Court gets the NC partisan gerrymandering cases again, likely early next term, there will be no Kennedy but there will likely be a fifth vote to finally hold these issues "nonjusticiable," meaning they can't be decided by the courts. /5
Show this thread -
Justice Scalia took the position that partisan gerrymandering cases were non-justiciable back in 2004 but J. Kennedy---the deciding vote---said we need more time to consider if there is a manageable standard. /6
Show this thread -
This term's Gill and Benisek cases gave Kennedy the chance to finally agree to rein in gerrymandering. But he stayed silent even as J. Kagan in her concurrence fleshed out Kennedy's favorite theory that it violates the First Amendment /7
Show this thread -
It is hard to believe that Scalia III (Gorsuch II) would do anything but side with Roberts, Alito, Thomas and Gorsuch that these cases are nonjusticiable and courts should stay out. /8
Show this thread -
Today's summary affirmance will just give another argument to
#ncga to try to avoid being reined in by the courts. But make no mistake: the kind of sharp gerrymandering practice in NC will now spread throughout the country in the 2020 round of redistricting /9Show this thread -
as with many things, things that seem bad will be much worse with Kennedy gone. /10
Show this thread -
Here's the
@SCOTUSBlog page for the lower court petitionhttp://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/harris-v-cooper/ …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.