It wouldn't have been. Garland would have joined 5 liberals and set out a standard for policing egregious partisan gerrrymanders. I don't think there's any question about that.https://twitter.com/mattsgorman/status/1008739373947473925 …
-
-
In today's concurring opinion, Justice Kagan made clear for herself and 3 other Justices that (1) there is standing to assert SOME injury from partisan gerrymandering and (2) a standard to hold it unconstitutional. Every reason to believe Garland would have joined.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.