J Kennedy's majority opinion is essentially a punt, requiring that body adjudicating claim of religious freedom against an anti-discrimination claim cannot have animus toward sincere religious beliefs. It decides nothing else. Battle between Kagan and Gorsuch shows what's cominghttps://twitter.com/vanitaguptaCR/status/1003646448465076224 …
-
-
Masterpiece’s Surprising Possible Implications for Partisan Gerrymandering Claims: Bad Intent and Silent Actors http://electionlawblog.org/?p=99315
Show this thread - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It kicks the can down the road. Meanwhile every bigot in the US feels legitimized & further empowered.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The free exercise stuff is trouble ... we saw it in Hobby Lobby. The dissent's reading of the situation appears to me on sounder ground. What if some state or lower court decides a case with less gay (or contraceptives or whatever) friendly judges?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As a non-expert on the Supreme Court, my impression is that Roberts is a political animal, Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas are evil reactionaries and GOP hacks, and Kennedy is a coward. Experts, is that close?https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/1003648660280733696 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.