I don’t think @Outsideness would claim it’s bad, but that humanist ethics are confused. I think the classic L/Acc take was something like “let’s make a robo commie utopia/FALC” which is obviously naive/irrational in its optimism. Would you say Dec is pessimistic in the long term?
-
-
Replying to @techocaine @linkolawave
Teleo-mechanical diagonalization doesn't leave a slot of free volition available to say: "X is good." ...
2 replies 1 retweet 26 likes -
... X is either promoting its emergence effectively, or not.
4 replies 6 retweets 21 likes -
Who exactly should the slot be left open to register the {good} descriptor— Even a teleological movement has to accurately refer to histor(icities) and be a logical continuation at least.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Practical affirmation or negation is a cybernetic function. To posit a judging subject, transcending the dynamic under evaluation and marking it with a +/- moral sign from beyond, is roughly as crude as metaphysics ever gets.
1 reply 4 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @CtrlRetrnRpresd and
... Rather: A positive (or explosive) cybernetic process affirms itself, by definition. A negative (or trapped) cybernetic process is denied, when it exceeds set limits, by a subject positioned as a pseudo-transcendent calibrator.
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @Outsideness @CtrlRetrnRpresd and
... Nature doesn't produce neutral ecology-cops, but it evidently produces beings who think it does.
1 reply 3 retweets 16 likes -
Certainly none that a bunch of dim apes are likely to grok.
2 replies 0 retweets 12 likes
have you ever read a statistical mechanics textbook
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.