Ryan GoodmanOvjeren akaunt

@rgoodlaw

Former Special Counsel . Co-editor-in-chief . Chaired Professor NYU Law. Former Chaired Professor Harvard Law.

New York, NY
Vrijeme pridruživanja: veljača 2013.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @rgoodlaw

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @rgoodlaw

  1. Prikvačeni tweet

    We couldn’t find a public resource like this. So we created it. Every subpoena Every letter from White House to witness Every witness’s testimony The whistleblower’s 2-page memo before his complaint (miss that one?) Every court filing (FOIA plus) More

    Poništi
  2. Is Joe proving himself helpful to the White House again? If reports are true that has no traction ( ), proposing a censure that fails is not helpful to constitutional norms, or preventing abuse by this and future presidents.

    Poništi
  3. 47 Dems and Independents plus at least: Alexander () Murkowski () Portman () Romney ()

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. “President Trump’s expected exclamation–Exoneration!–will ring hollow given the bipartisan conclusion on the factual record: He did it. And it looks like a majority of the Senate will have agreed.” From the other article I published Monday .

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    WOW: This tweet has over 40,000 retweets and is 100% false. I have receipts. Don't let misinformation steal the 2020 election. RT for the truth!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    . this is disputed directly by the Iowa Secretary of State, and appears to be election disinformation.

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Terrific piece by noting that in blocking witnesses and evidence, Senate Republicans showed seething contempt for the voters' right to make an informed decision about Trump's misconduct, and why this is so profoundly anti-democratic:

    Poništi
  8. I put my thoughts together on what was so wrong with Senate's decision to block from testifying. It's an affront to all Americans. Tramples on their right to know and democratic participation in the impeachment process. I put it together here.👇

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    This is how you show a government that press intimidation doesn't work Political journalists boycott No 10 briefing after PM's aide tries to ban selected reporters

    Poništi
  10. "The rejection of the House Managers' facts provides incentives for media outlets to continue to investigate this space, for the House to continue to oversee the matter after the Senate votes, and for political opponents competing for these Senate seats to continue to press..."

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. I just published (with Danielle Schulkin) this.👇 Many are rightfully seizing on and 's conclusion that Trump did it. But the other approach by GOP Senators is also damaging to President Trump down the line.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Let’s be real: if Obama’s account posted something like this, it’d have been used for years as evidence that he didn’t respect middle America

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. Poništi
  14. 2. velj

    With this ridiculous statement by .👇 Recall in early Nov. 2016, GOP leaders were talking about impeaching a President . Link: ( report) Shows, yet again, how Republicans’ handling of Trump impeachment was a farce.

    Tweet je nedostupan.
    Poništi
  15. 2. velj

    1. The Senator reads the impeachment clause out of existence. Amazing. 2. Nixon WAS removed through impeachment clause (and Trump's actions are, in truth, ). 3. Many of Alexander's GOP colleagues were around in 1999 and voted to remove Clinton for far less.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 2. velj

    <2-tweet thread> : "There's a reason why...we've never removed a President through the impeachment clause. Because the Founders envisioned that the people would make the decision about who the President is." WRONG on three counts.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 2. velj

    “I think that's up to him.” Senator Lamar Alexander can’t even bring himself to say Trump should express regret/apologize. Also: “I hope he...never mentions it” in State of Union. Note to the wise: is Trump’s honorary campaign chair in Tennessee.

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Poništi
  19. 2. velj

    Wasn’t Buttigieg’s name that tanked Des Moines Iowa poll. “An interviewer at the poll's call center increased the font size of the questionnaire on their screen so much that the bottom choice (which rotated between calls) wasn't visible”

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    We watched it . It was an absurdist piece of legally baseless theatre that demeaned and mocked the law and our profession.

    Poništi
  21. 2. velj

    2. Why is it significant that Cory Gardner () and Thom Tillis () played pivotal role in shutting down witnesses despite the will of 75% of Americans? They're among the most vulnerable Republicans, and voters may want to remember their actions in November.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·