Reza AslanVerified account

Their goal is not to appear objective - their goal is to protect Trump and cover their own Trump-loving asses under the guise of trying to appear objective.

So far today I've seen "reversed his position" and "appears to contradict." The closest I've seen anyone come is "was disingenuous" which in all fairness does mean "lied" but doesn't have the same weight.

@CNN said “big, fat lie” this morning.

It’s like when there is a terrorist attack by a white guy. All of a sudden every word that can be used other than terrorist is found and repeated.

There are no lies in the post-truth world. The media simply reflects that. Truth is entirely subjective in America. Many appear not to realize this.

I'm so tired of it. He has told over 3,000 LIES while in office. Why, when reporting, doesn't the media just say, "He lied....."?

We know the answer -- desperate euphemisms galore.

“Or will they keeping using” is unfortunate grammar for an author

It's on video there is nothing to be objective about. If they won't call the president out they lose their credibility in my eyes.

You know the frustration and anger are real when there are two grammatical errors on Reza Aslan’s tweet.

Bro, they fired you for telling the truth. What do you think?

@nytimes called it “reversed his position”

And will the media defense a comedian's freedom of speech, or will they keep in crucifying her for telling the truth about a pathological liar?

As well as report on Rudy and Newt equating the FBI to Nazis

Which lie are you talking about? So many