You are proving his point, and as you're not stupid & must know this dishonesty is driving the far right what is your aim here?
-
-
-
That's what's scariest to me here. How far will these guys go? They clearly know exactly what they're doing. It's scary dishonesty.
-
Yup. It's why instead of responding angrily to him/them I pose questions. I'm more interested in speaking to their audience than them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why do you insist on quote mining instead of taking into account the entirety of what he says?
-
Then he might have to acknowledge the substance of Sam's points, rather than attempting to paint him as a bigot.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is blatantly false. Sam has, on multiple occasions, called for a greater number of Muslim immigrants to the United States.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You are so dishonest and everyone sees it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The disingenuousness you display is breathtaking.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
-
If you ever work on tv again, I predict your imbecilic tweets will once again get you fired. Can we bet on it? And
@mehdirhasan , try harderpic.twitter.com/Mp8U2pO8mf
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did you block
@SamHarrisOrg samhwhile continuing to mention him ? -
Yes he did. The little viper.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Some bad arguments come from rational minds worth debating. Others are irrational and unworthy or impossible to debate.
@SamHarrisOrg -
@SamHarrisOrg introduced a bad argument he judged rational enough to deserve refutation, then proceeded to devise one. -
The distinction "rational" had a clear purpose here: to distinguish arguments worth refuting from arguments too emotional to bother with.
-
How can a man who's working thesis is "instinctive animosity clouds honest judgement of strangers" have no failsafes in place for himself?
-
If
@rezaaslan thinks good-faith engagement with bad ideas is a compliment and not a duty, that explains his bad faith with@SamHarrisOrg. -
When honest empathetic engagement with immoral ideas is forbidden, the disciplinary tools left are humiliation or violence. Sound familiar?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.