@ThePlumLineGS Trump's numbers are much worse. But Clinton's historic-if-not-for-Trump unfavorables are still important to note.
"the only groups who view Trump favorably are non-college white men, by 52-46"https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/06/15/theres-no-equivalence-here-trump-is-far-more-disliked-than-clinton/ …
-
-
-
the piece is all about how there isn't actually any equivalent, even if her numbers are bad
-
I read it, and I hear you. But C's polls aren't just bad. They're unprecedented for a Dem. Trump's are just worse.
-
True, but Trump's are a lot worse. & Key diff: He is faring worse among *his* constituencies than she is among hers
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@ThePlumLineGS so essentially those who hated that us changed because of civil rights movementThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ThePlumLineGS U mean by all the potential psychos....the kind you avoid when in a bar or queuing at Wal Mart...!?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@washingtonpost Hillary had btw 65-66% favorability 2009-2013, but it looks like GOP & Sanders/Berniebots smear machines worked -
This Tweet is unavailable
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
the gun toting, Muslim and black haters and wife abusers
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ThePlumLineGS do these "facts " come from the same place you got your degrees?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.