@rezaaslan Do what you do best. Write a book. People who objected to your last one will find balance in your views.
No one has said that. The debate is over how historically reliable isnad is and variability of ahadith https://twitter.com/syzamchw/status/632604419029381120 …
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rezaaslan @SyZamChw@lettywho1 Again, this also would mean the debate is over the historical reliability of existing qira'at of the Quran.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rezaaslan @SyZamChw@lettywho1 - I have2disagree with U on that. Azami's "On Schacht's Origins.." & esp "Studies.." R solid on the Isnad.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rezaaslan Only skeptical Muslims would debate it as there is no way to ascertain 1200 years old chain of narrations. For believers its overThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.