@JonKneeGlass @MaajidNawaz to be honest, I thought it was obvious given repeated references to IS etc throughout - but no harm spelling out
-
@rezaaslan Did I imply anything different? Or are we agreeing?!@AzadehMoaveni@MaajidNawaz @JonKneeGlass
@Freedland @AzadehMoaveni @MaajidNawaz @JonKneeGlass You did not. Maajid did. It's his error I'm correcting.
-
-
@rezaaslan@Freedland@AzadehMoaveni @JonKneeGlass sorry, what error? Nobody brought Hamas into this but you, Reza. -
@MaajidNawaz@Freedland@AzadehMoaveni The error of constantly referring to jihadists as islamists. that error. -
@rezaaslan@Freedland@AzadehMoaveni as you will eventually read in my clarifications made to Sam in our dialogue. Jihadism is a subset -
@MaajidNawaz@Freedland@AzadehMoaveni And as I'm patiently explaining to you right now you are incorrect. It's not subset. It split from it -
@rezaaslan@Freedland@AzadehMoaveni that's what I mean by subset.Meaning they still share core tenets. But please don't loose your patience -
@MaajidNawaz@Freedland@AzadehMoaveni Split is not subset. Jihadists=ANTI Islamists; B Laden spent more words against MB than he did West -
@rezaaslan@Freedland@AzadehMoaveni Tired old Ikhwani arguments. Get with the times bro. Stalin killed Trotsky. Both were Communists though -
@MaajidNawaz@Freedland@AzadehMoaveni Jesus Christ! That is a hilariously poor historical analogy. For your sake don't say that in public. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.