@rezaaslan not if you start the data on September 10th 2001.
-
-
-
@antitheistic1@rezaaslan What if you start 19 April 1995? Or 16 September 1920? Or during Reconstruction? -
@ballunix@antitheistic1@rezaaslan Balls. Blatant obfuscation. -
@KMKVSKP The point is that one's notion of terrorism is highly dependent upon one's historical view. Folks now in their later years
-
@KMKVSKP didn't read about lynchings in a history text book, they read about them in the newspaper. A generation younger
-
@KMKVSKP might primarily associate terrorism with the radical left like the Weather Underground and Baader-Meinhof
-
@KMKVSKP younger still and terrorism might be intimately linked to the Troubles where Catholics and Protestants were shooting-up and bombing
-
@KMKVSKP places around Ireland. The Unabomber and McVeigh might have been the formative terror attacks of one's life.
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@rezaaslan r these "homegrown radicals"of a melanin-privileged/melanin-lacking complexion? cuz as we saw this week, if its the 2nd, i agreeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rezaaslan Just for you. Same study different analysis. http://securitydata.newamerica.net/extremists/analysis.html …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rezaaslan this had the opposite of the intended effect on me, considering the high % of jihadist murders relative to low % of muslims in USThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.