@OmarBaddar on BDS or on Temple Mount?
-
@rezaaslan I don't think that's correct; 242 calls for withdrawing from "territories occupied in recent conflict", which includes the Mount.
@OmarBaddar you're right. it may be a diff resolution I'm thinking. on your point tho in 48 they did not control mount. Not until 67 right?
-
-
@rezaaslan@OmarBaddar Sorry to butt in on this, but Int. control of Mount area goes back to original Partition plan: http://www.1948.org.uk/maps/phased-occupation/2993657 … -
@rezaaslan@OmarBaddar Having said that, it's not exactly a plausible idea. No such thing as "international control" anywhere in the world
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rezaaslan yup, correct. So by the time 242 defined what's "occupied territory", that includes temple mount as part of E Jerusalem.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.