@OmarBaddar on BDS or on Temple Mount?
-
@rezaaslan Temple Mount -- it's in occupied East Jerusalem.
@OmarBaddar 242 says EJ for Palestine and the Mount is to be under international trust. You may disagree. But that's what it says & I agree
-
-
.
@rezaaslan@OmarBaddar to make it easy, here's 242, please show me where it says this beyond ur imagination http://unispal.un.org/unispal.nsf/0/7D35E1F729DF491C85256EE700686136 … -
@BDS4Justice@rezaaslan@OmarBaddar I think it's actually 194 where there is reference to an international trust or some language like that -
@freespeechlover@BDS4Justice@rezaaslan It's actually resolution 181 (the original 1947 partition plan), which lost relevance after 1967. -
@OmarBaddar Yes 181 the original partition. Regardless I fully support intl trust of mount. I should also say I reject two state solution -
@rezaaslan That's a sensible position, but currently Old City still occupied & target of illegal evictions & takeovers. Btw (...1/2) -
@rezaaslan (2/2) you may find this video interesting on 1 vs 2 states (skip first 2 minutes, just basic history):https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqKtD6k77vw … -
@OmarBaddar I'll check it out. Spoil the surprise and tell me which side you fall on. 1 or 2? -
@rezaaslan In perfect world I prefer 1 state. But in this world I believe there's good reason to focus on ending occupation (video explains) - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@rezaaslan I don't think that's correct; 242 calls for withdrawing from "territories occupied in recent conflict", which includes the Mount. -
@OmarBaddar you're right. it may be a diff resolution I'm thinking. on your point tho in 48 they did not control mount. Not until 67 right? -
@rezaaslan@OmarBaddar Sorry to butt in on this, but Int. control of Mount area goes back to original Partition plan: http://www.1948.org.uk/maps/phased-occupation/2993657 … -
@rezaaslan@OmarBaddar Having said that, it's not exactly a plausible idea. No such thing as "international control" anywhere in the world
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.