@rezaaslan Do you think I defined "true Islam" as ISIS? Just interesting to hear that, as I have no real concept of "true Islam."
The Atlantic Ignores Muslim Intellectuals, Defines “True Islam” As ISIShttp://interc.pt/1As0pgv
-
-
-
@gcaw not at all tho that is BY FAR the majority view of those who've read your piece which is why it would've helped if you quoted scholars -
@rezaaslan The prophets themselves were not permitted to choose how their words were interpreted. (كما قال غرام الصحفي) -
@gcaw Ha. Yes. Very good. And I do not think it is your fault that you are being read this way. Only that it could've easily been mitigated - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
@jalivezb@rezaaslan what does it pervert? Muhammad could have easily been the leader of IS with his actions. -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
@jalivezb@rezaaslan@TheAtlantic the only way to solve this problem is to do what the West did, discount religion in civil society. -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
-
@rezaaslan Muslim intellectuals? Isn't that an oxymoron? -
@rezaaslan I have to say same@davidowen_sd Not"fan"of Aslan. But@FFFlewey your statement is "not much intelectual"a all. Clear Fail.. -
@MichaelASwing@rezaaslan@davidowen_sd Intellectuals don't believe in fairy tales. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@rezaaslan It seems to me, especially reading some of Haykel's follow-up comments, that the article could have been a little clearer.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@almostfearless@rezaaslan For same reason we will have war forever: He was paid. Lots of money in keeping war going.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rezaaslan supports the narrative -as does fox's "holy war"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.