Sam Harris: "If I could wave magic wand & get rid of rape or religion I would not hesitate to get rid of religion”http://www.salon.com/2014/11/21/reza_aslan_sam_harris_and_new_atheists_arent_new_arent_even_atheists/ …
-
@rezaaslan it isn't the point? Well it certainly seems to me to be part of your argument against the "new" atheism.pic.twitter.com/7OyOXWndX8
@SteveOnIt Did you notice I spent 2000 words defining NEW ATHEISM as NOT ATHEISM but ANTI-ATHEISM?
-
-
@rezaaslan ok then. Show me the ANTI-THEISTS burning churches and killing believers. -
@SteveOnIt first of all I cite two of them on the piece. Second look at definition of fundamentalism in piece not your own. Third bye bye -
@rezaaslan I do love how you got offended when I used one quote to define your position.@SamHarrisOrg
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rezaaslan I'm an atheist and want absolutely nothing to do with the fundamentalists within that community, i.e., New Atheists. -
@ZRhazes
@rezaaslan well fundamentalists is probably the wrong word. But anti-theist is a fair label.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rezaaslan@SteveOnIt hitters religion was national socialism, Stalins religion was Stalinism. These guys were hardly free from dogmaThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rezaaslan@SteveOnIt Anti-theists are not atheists in the same sense that men are not people. In short: you're a nincompoop. -
@DistantOcean you win the dumbest tweet on this subject award! Congrats! -
@SteveOnIt Thanks, but I was addressing Reza--not you. If you still think it's dumb, you're probably not understanding it. -
@DistantOcean apologies. I did not get it. I do now. My bad. -
@SteveOnIt No problem--given that you were one of the few sane people on the thread it's understandable to assume I was going after you too.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.