he conflates credibility & not liking his ethical drive. True or not, he says isn't the point. But credible = that
Statement from @HurdOnTheHill, congressman & ex-CIA agent, says Assange "not a credible source." Trump cited Assange to discredit US intelpic.twitter.com/AGpReqB4dy
-
-
-
in fact there isn't a single xample of similarly credible source as WikiLeaks, 10 years without disputed veracity!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DrZickler@HurdOnTheHill Discrediting the US intel comm is what he needs to do in order to discredit what they found on trump.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm sure Trump will do his "wrong" face to anyone disagreeing with him. Too damn bad!
-
here it is. He can say it all he wants. Doesn't make him right.pic.twitter.com/pkjHO23tXX
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
where is the part of
@HurdOnTheHill 's finishing statement that"anyone who believes Assange instead of 17 IC orgs is a traitor"?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Unlike the CIA wikileaks has never harmed or killed anyone. 10yrs of publishing a proven track record.
#DefendWLpic.twitter.com/pAzcsUaddr
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Totally OK if I gut US Intel capabilities right now because I totally trust Assange's assessment."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.