-
-
-
-
-
People should really learn to have more fun with old tweets, is what I’m saying. You wanted a quick scalp. You didn’t think it through. Every man that has has to work with her at the NYT is going to have to go to work in a giant hamster ball
Show this thread -
In summation, digital lynch mobs = bad. Uncomfortable work environment at the New York Times = good. Be better people.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And I'm sure CNN is pissed they didn't hire her first.
-
Wait a year
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I’ll give her this: She’s an unbiased racist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
Do you get the feeling that
@nytimes really didn't vet@sarahjeung the way they really really SHOULD have??? -
Do you get the feeling that
@nytimes really didn't have a problem with@sarahjeung being racist against white people when they vetted her? -
I get the feeling that it's a criterion for hiring.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sarahjeong supports firing racists but only when she isn't the racist in question.#DoubleStandardspic.twitter.com/KgOGcWNjUW
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
So basically she’s like this and essentially gets paid for it
@HockeyFanGirl12@AngieShustock@sues711pic.twitter.com/GzYECt0Mi9 -
1: That may be the best GIF ever. 2: I want that cat.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
She seems nice.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.