That is wrong I can't believe that
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It isn't voyeurism under s67 of the Sexual Offences Act but may be an offence of outraging public decency. The culpit wasn't charged though.
-
Good case for statutory amendment of the Sexual Offences Act to cover such behaviour.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
[thread] [1]