Rachel Maclean MP #StayAlertVerified account

This is a truly amazing piece of revisionism. They voted to give themselves sufficient time to scrutinise the bill properly, it was your gov that didn’t allow proper time. Perhaps you can use the time to release the impact assessments so you can tell us what a great deal it is.

No Rachel, they voted for more time than the Government wanted to allow for scrutiny of this legislation. They voted to allow our parliament to have the time it needs to do its job.

It is not about getting it rapid it is about getting it right. Why did you refuse to sit with Labour and compromise. 17 hours on a deal that will have an impact for years to come at least deserves a discussion Johnson’s do or die is childish.

43% of the voters in your constituency. 28.5k voted leave out of 66.5k voters. And your constituency population is 110k. So in fact only 26% of your constituents voted for leave. Just saying.

Rachel there were 17.4 mill there are now approx 16 mill through demographics alone and the 16.3 mill is now approx 18 mill That 17.4 mill was only 26% of the Population Research last week indicates that over 100 of the seats which were Leave have now become Remain 62% really

I wonder what you would have voted had this been a labour government. Everyone with any common sense knows 3 days for this is way to short. A short delay now will make no difference in 5 years if we get the right deal.

Delete from the 62% the net ‘takers’ ... Brexit voters retired on pensions they want the younger generation to fund from an economy they voted to get poorer, despite having careers spanning almost exactly our time in the EU ( with the benefits it has brought them)

No, dear, they voted to allow themselves the time to look at it properly rather than trying to rush something through that might be a bad deal. In other words, the house acted as you *should* have done. Of course, the Gov't releasing it's impact statements would be beneficial...