They have clearly explained; it is to give your PM time to get his “great deal” which he has made NO headway in doing and has no hope of getting one by 31/10. Keep up! We thought you wanted a good deal for Redditch?
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
How is leaving without a deal going to benefit the residents of Redditch?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do keep up please -You wanted a deal only the PM hasn't made 1 stride to get 1. Meanwhile proroguing set us on a course to crash out. A suicide mission for the UK - but "hey ho over we go" say MP's like yourself. A split Party with minus 43 Majority how do you think it's going?pic.twitter.com/j2x9yD7Onn
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They did explain, to stop a no deal.... Obvious
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is exactly right
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And yet you know no deal is an absolute fallacy. You leave and then the first thing you do is ask for a deal, but from a worse position and in essence reset the clock on the entire Brexit negotiation. It's simply a false choice.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

