In terms of my politics, I could still be classified as a kind of radical feminist but my views diverge so much from what gets called "radical feminism" these days that I hesitate to call myself one.
-
-
I had bought into the lesbian feminist idea of lesbians being a threat to patriarchy and an expression of female liberation. And yet now I was watching lesbian feminists working with the likes of the Heritage Foundation. How was that radical or a challenge to male power?
Show this thread -
It seemed like some lesbian feminists believed so much in their inherent radicalism that it prevented them from seeimg how they could be co-opted by right-wing patriarchy. It made me question what mattered more, how someone identitfied or their actions and political analysis?
Show this thread -
I figured out I could keep all the parts I liked about radical feminism and see myself as whatever gender felt most true. I didn't have to be a woman or lesbian to practice radical feminist politics. I could be a transmasculine genderweirdo and a radical feminist.
Show this thread -
I also realized that certain tendencies in radical feminism could become very reactionary and dangerous. I'm opposed to how gender crits and rad fems are attacking trans people but I'm also horrified by what they've done to feminism, how they're allowing the Right to co-opt it.
Show this thread -
Transphobic radical and gender crit feminism needs to be seen not just as a threat to trans people but as part of a anti-feminist backlash, as a threat to all women. When radical feminism gets co-opted by reactionaries it's a disaster for women, gay people and trans people.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.