2/ We don’t know the breakdown of the $110B, but the NYT previously reported that JCT estimated international bank relief from BEAT to be around $50 billion. This was later finalized in the regulations.https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/30/business/trump-tax-cuts-beat-gilti.html …
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
3/ Presumably, the high tax regulatory exception to GILTI is contributing to the $110B as well.
Prikaži ovu nit -
4/ Notably, CBO adjusted their projections downward because their original understanding of the law did not anticipate Treasury’s extratextual stance. This undermines Treasury’s view that the statute gave it legal authority to issue the regulations in question.
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
nice spot!
-
Credit goes to
@dashching, as is often the case in the tax world. - Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Rebecca, thanks much for pointing this out. I need a deep dive into CBO cites. You can be sure JCT estimators did anticipate regulatory giveaways and aggressive tax planning. But how CBO is able to quantify the difference between JCT assumptions and reality is a mystery to me.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.