Just proves that is what he wants is a full gun ban.
The "assault weapons" that Beto O'Rourke wants to confiscate are not especially deadly, but the symbolism of that policy is poisonous.https://reason.com/2019/09/13/vicious-scapegoating-is-the-whole-point-of-beto-orourkes-gun-grab/ …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just because the features of the assault weapons ban are bad and would allow some equally deadly weapons to remain in circulation does not infact mean that AR-15 and the like are "not especially deadly"
-
This is a garbage tweet from reason. Not especially deadly....righttttttttttt. Thank you
@Michaelander45 for your reasonable response to this nonsense. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
“Since O’Rourke has already announced that he plans to confiscate “assault weapons,” ” That is actually false. He wants to confiscate those of citizens who are not in the police or the military , etc !
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It doesn’t matter. His campaign officially ended last night. RIP.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Population. 1970: 205m, 1980: 226m, 1990: 250m, 2000: 282m, today: 330m
End of conversation
-
-
-
They’ve just increased the death count of most of the worst mass shootings. I guess those lives don’t count just because the total number isn’t that high. That’s one twisted way to look at things.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Las Vegas shooter was able to kill 58 people with assault weapons, firing off over 1,100 rounds from the 32nd floor. Handguns would have been nearly as deadly???
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.