Steve CoxKonto zweryfikowane

Yup. You are naive to believe otherwise,. IF you feel that way, congrats ! you are example of one who has succumbed to right-wing narrative

Name one time a right-wing rally turned violent in the last 40 years without agitators from the other side.

I turn that question on you: WHY should those who are abhorred by a rally's content NOT show up to defend their community ?

Defend their community from what? A group of ignorant people saying ignorant shit for a few hours?

One more time: That a gathering may be 'free speech' is NOT synonymous to that gathering being non-violent, non-aggressive, non-threatening.

Let's define terms: "Violent" means physical harm results. "Threat" requires a statement of intent. Agreed?

Look up legal definition of Assault. Requires no physicality. Thanks for talk, gotta get some work done. But (truly) appreciate the convo.

You avoided a ton of direct questions. Evasiveness is a form of dishonesty. Assault requires a threat. A threat requires statement of intent