Not sure why @Firefox is being pedantic about content types here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=975809#c14 … Do you @BrendanEich ? Because Chrome just PLAYS!
-
-
Replying to @kaihendry
@kaihendry@firefox Seems Bill G. gets different results from you in Chrome. Cc'ing@bz_moz2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich
@BrendanEich@kaihendry@firefox And some Chrome versions are not following the spec, last I checked.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @really_bz
@bz_moz Hope you guys become less pedantic, perhaps follow "Postel's law" and compete with Chrome? ;)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kaihendry
@kaihendry Postel's law on the web leads to race-to-the-bottom failures. See http://trevorjim.com/postels-law-is-not-for-you/ … and various other writing on the issue.2 replies 4 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @really_bz
@bz_moz hm, interesting! Still not 100% convinced. If Chrome offers a better UX now, you want a spec change to fix it for FF?#uncompetitive2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kaihendry
@kaihendry And the spec change is needed because if everyone expects well-specified sniffing, that eliminates a lot of the security problems1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @really_bz
@bz_moz btw when you say "spec", you mean@WHATWG right? Wonder if@Hixie, could pls look at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=975809 …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@kaihendry @WHATWG @Hixie That's the relevant spec here from my point of view, yes.
-
-
Replying to @really_bz
@bz_moz@kaihendry See https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11984 … for the spec status of this.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.