Not sure why @Firefox is being pedantic about content types here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=975809#c14 … Do you @BrendanEich ? Because Chrome just PLAYS!
-
-
Replying to @kaihendry
@kaihendry@firefox Seems Bill G. gets different results from you in Chrome. Cc'ing@bz_moz2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrendanEich
@BrendanEich@kaihendry@firefox And some Chrome versions are not following the spec, last I checked.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @really_bz
@bz_moz Hope you guys become less pedantic, perhaps follow "Postel's law" and compete with Chrome? ;)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kaihendry
@kaihendry Postel's law on the web leads to race-to-the-bottom failures. See http://trevorjim.com/postels-law-is-not-for-you/ … and various other writing on the issue.2 replies 4 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @really_bz
@bz_moz hm, interesting! Still not 100% convinced. If Chrome offers a better UX now, you want a spec change to fix it for FF?#uncompetitive2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kaihendry
@kaihendry Better UX is a bit subjective where content sniffing is involved. Please read up on the history of sniffing and security issues.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @really_bz
@bz_moz users just want it work. I appreciate the argument and the need for balance. Want Firefox to be usable on http://video.geekout.org.uk/ :)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@kaihendry Users just wanted HTML sent as text/plain to work, and it did in some browsers. But you might notice it doesn't anymore...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.