@mathias @gsnedders That would be http://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html … but then I don't get the String.prototype section of http://javascript.spec.whatwg.org/
-
-
-
@gsnedders@mathias Sure. My point was that it's in ES6 as far as I can tell. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@bz_moz If your point is that it can be removed from http://javascript.spec.whatwg.org/#string at this point, then sure, you’re right. +@gsnedders -
@mathias@gsnedders Yeah, I was just trying to figure out what incompatibilities remained between "ECMAScript" and "BrowserScript". - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@bz_moz The first few algorithms that made it into the ES6 spec draft were incorrect. http://javascript.spec.whatwg.org/#string helped there. +@gsneddersThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.